What changes in auto repair shops operations
Auto repair groups coordinate inspections, maintenance plans, repair orders, and parts-related work across shops. A central team needs shop-level reporting that separates recurring program units from one-time jobs. Store the shop assignment, cycle quantity, price source, and supporting follow-up in one place so an unusual amount can be explained before it reaches the next billing step.
Watch for these gaps
- Counting repair orders as recurring program units
- Leaving an archived shop in the active reporting queue
- Using a price override to hide an incorrect service quantity
A repeatable billing processing run workflow
- 01
Open Billing processing and select the prepared run that has a reviewed preview.
- 02
Confirm the eligible and deferred work before choosing the approval action.
- 03
Approve and submit the run once, keeping its operation context visible.
- 04
Follow the resulting invoice and notification states for completion or recovery.
Bring the industry records into the review
For auto repair shops, use shop directory with franchise status and local operating contact; maintenance-plan or inspection-unit quantities by cycle; repair-period exceptions and supporting document requests as the evidence packet. Keep the franchise and reporting period attached to each record so a reviewer can follow the source without reconstructing the conversation.
What to do when the review finds a problem
More than one prepared run or preview is available.
Select the prepared run whose scope and preview are the ones the team reviewed.
The preview contains deferred or blocked entries.
Resolve or explicitly record deferred work before approval so it is not mistaken for eligible work.
The reviewed run is ready for processing.
Approve and submit once, then follow the operation state rather than starting a second run.
The run finishes with anything other than the expected complete state.
Open the resulting invoice or delivery record when processing reports a partial or failed outcome.
A common mistake to avoid
Approving a different or older preview because its totals look similar to the run under review.
Before you mark the work complete
A processing approval record linking the reviewed preview to one submission and its resulting invoice and notification states.
- The approved run matches the reviewed preview.
- Eligible and deferred work is understood.
- Invoice and notification outcomes are followed afterward.
Verify each shop's program assignment and reporting owner before checking amounts. Keep repair orders, inspections, and recurring maintenance in separate units, then review blank, zero, and positive quantities as different states. Check that overrides are still active and justified, and resolve any stale-version response before finalizing the cycle.
Download the auto repair shops review worksheet →A situation to work through
An auto repair network can review a monthly maintenance program by shop, search a location, and compare the reported service count with the rule's organization price and effective amount. A shop manager's correction is previewed before save, and a stale row is reloaded rather than overwritten. The result is a period record that explains the quantity and its reviewer.
Apply the billing processing run steps above to this situation. Record the original evidence, the unresolved question, and the person who can answer it before treating the item as complete. This is a planning example, not a customer result.
How should an organization process an invoice run?
Start from a prepared preview, review eligible and deferred work, approve the run once, and follow the resulting invoice and notification states. Processing preserves the run context so teams can investigate a failed or incomplete outcome.
Put the workflow into practice
Granite's billing processing workspace connects a reviewed preview to one approval and its resulting states.
Use this guide to organize your process, then configure the applicable franchises, reporting periods, and billing rules in Granite.